Tim Davie's resignation was the bare minimum - the BBC needs massive changes

Tim Davie's resignation from the BBC wasn't just inevitable - it was essential. His departure symbolises the end of a leadership era that tried to plaster over the cracks of an institution that's rotting from within. The problem isn't simply about one man at the top. It's about a culture that's become so inward-looking, so self-congratulatory, that it's lost sight of the people it's meant to serve.

We lost trust in the Beeb when it seemingly ignored serious questions over Huw Edwards' behaviour and conduct. We lost faith when Gary Lineker was allowed to repeatedly break the BBC's own social media guidelines without consequence. And now, the final straw - a documentary that's clearly stitched up Donald Trump, the most powerful man in the free world, under the guise of journalism. That's not impartiality; that's agenda-driven storytelling. Davie had to resign. It was the least he could do. No amount of glowing praise from BBC Chairman Samir Shah is going to change that.

The BBC likes to call itself the nation's broadcaster - a beacon of impartiality and balance. But let's be honest: that's a convenient myth. The top tier of the corporation is stuffed with posh guys from the same media elite - Oxbridge-educated executives who've never struggled to pay a bill, never worried about rent, and wouldn't know what it feels like to live outside the M25 bubble.

They talk endlessly about diversity, yet the voices missing most from their newsrooms are working-class ones. The people who actually make up the backbone of Britain rarely get a look in.

Davie talked a big game about restoring trust and impartiality. But you can't change the public's perception when the very newsroom culture rewards conformity over challenge. The BBC doesn't need another review or panel - it needs a root and branch overhaul. Until it brings in genuine outsiders who reflect the real Britain, the decline will only deepen.